[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Then, If XML Namespaces are a *big mess*, which other alternatives can be designed to address the problems that the XML Namespaces spec covers?
Regards,
Sergio Rodríguez.
"Edward C. Zimmermann" <edz@bsn.com> wrote:
Quoting Elliotte Harold <ELHARO@METALAB.UNC.EDU>:
> Sergio J. Rodriguez M. wrote:
>
> > If Namespaces are in fact a disaster, then why is widely used in any XML
> > Vocabulary, like RDF or OWL?
>
> Because we didn't know better six years ago. Some things you only learn
> from brutal experience.
We DID know better. Just nobody listened to us as old SGML fools.
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Net: La mejor conexión a internet y 25MB extra a tu correo por
$100 al mes.
|
