xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Is "(//c)[a]" valid in Xpath 1.0?

Re: [xml-dev] Is "(//c)[a]" valid in Xpath 1.0?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Is "(//c)[a]" valid in Xpath 1.0?
From: Oleg Paraschenko <usenet@datahansa.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 18:40:27 +0300
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <200411121151.LAA09169@penguin.nag.co.uk>
Organization: DataHansa Software
References: <20041112143439.13ea83a0.usenet@datahansa.com><200411121151.LAA09169@penguin.nag.co.uk>

  Hello David,

On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 11:51:14 GMT
David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> wrote:

...
> 
> yes, yes.
> 
> production [15] says a parenthesized expression is a PrimaryExpr
> production  [20] says a FilterExpr is a PrimaryExpr
> optionally followed by a Predicate (which is an Expression surrounded
> by[] by production [8]
> 
> and production [19] says a FilterEXpr is a PathExpr

  Thank you a lot!

> 
> David
> 

-- 
Oleg

References:
- Is "(//c)[a]" valid in Xpath 1.0?
  - From: Oleg Paraschenko <usenet@datahansa.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Is "(//c)[a]" valid in Xpath 1.0?
  - From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Invalid tokens
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] XML Performance in Client-Server Interactions
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Is "(//c)[a]" valid in Xpath 1.0?
Next by thread: Excellent Insight on Standards Development vs Invention
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread