xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Hostility to "binary XML" (was Re: [xml-dev] XML 2004weblo

Re: [xml-dev] Hostility to "binary XML" (was Re: [xml-dev] XML 2004weblo

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Liam Quin <liam@w3.org>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Hostility to "binary XML" (was Re: [xml-dev] XML 2004weblog items?)
From: Oleg Tkachenko <oleg@tkachenko.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 23:52:09 +0200
Cc: Derek Denny-Brown <derekdb@microsoft.com>, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <20041122213401.GI23371@w3.org>
Organization: Multiconn Technologies
References: <075E1759251CCB49ABF05D8F742AFE2704298D39@RED-MSG-50.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <20041122213401.GI23371@w3.org>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910

Liam Quin wrote:

> One can do validation in the writer and then plausibly skip the sort of
> checks you mention in a reader, and still be talking about XML, even
> with today's textual interchange formats.

I believe that would be a disaster from security's "all input is evil" 
point of view.

-- 
Oleg Tkachenko
http://blog.tkachenko.com
Multiconn Technologies, Israel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] Hostility to "binary XML" (was Re: [xml-dev] XML 2004 weblog items?)
  - From: Liam Quin <liam@w3.org>

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Hostility to "binary XML" (was Re: [xml-dev] XML 2004 weblog items?)
  - From: "Derek Denny-Brown" <derekdb@microsoft.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Hostility to "binary XML" (was Re: [xml-dev] XML 2004 weblog items?)
  - From: Liam Quin <liam@w3.org>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Hostility to "binary XML" (was Re: [xml-dev] XML 2004 weblog items?)
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Hostility to "binary XML" (was Re: [xml-dev] XML 2004 weblog items?)
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Hostility to "binary XML" (was Re: [xml-dev] XML 2004 weblog items?)
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Hostility to "binary XML" (was Re: [xml-dev] XML 2004 weblog items?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread