xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Hostility to "binary XML" (was Re: [xml-dev] XML 2004 webl

Re: [xml-dev] Hostility to "binary XML" (was Re: [xml-dev] XML 2004 webl

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Hostility to "binary XML" (was Re: [xml-dev] XML 2004 weblog items?)
From: Liam Quin <liam@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:04:21 -0500
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D103B24D3C@RED-MSG-31.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D103B24D3C@RED-MSG-31.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i

On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 01:52:31PM -0800, Dare Obasanjo wrote:
> Interesting, so if I'm writing an XML Web Service end point I should
> trust third parties to do the well-formedness and validity checking as a
> "performance enhancement"?
'phew, I'm glad I didn't suggest that :-)

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Hostility to "binary XML" (was Re: [xml-dev] XML 2004 weblog items?)
  - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Hostility to "binary XML" (was Re: [xml-dev] XML 20 04 weblog items?)
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Hostility to "binary XML" (was Re: [xml-dev] XML 2004 weblog items?)
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Hostility to "binary XML" (was Re: [xml-dev] XML 2004 weblog items?)
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Hostility to "binary XML" (was Re: [xml-dev] XML 2004 weblog items?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread