OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help



   IEEE floats and binary XML [Re: [xml-dev] binary XML API and scientificu

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

Wolfgang Hoschek wrote:

> On Nov 22, 2004, at 1:01 PM, Aleksander Slominski wrote:
>> are use cases related to XML Binary Characterization 
>> <http://www.w3.org/TR/xbc-use-cases/>?
> They might fit into that "diverse" bag-of-things as well...
>> i am a bit disappointed that scientific requirements are completely 
>> omitted form XBC use cases - the closest i could find is 
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/xbc-use-cases/#FPenergy but it skips over whole 
>> issue how to transfer array of doubles without changing endianess ...
> I may be wrong, but conversion of doubles to strings and back seems 
> the main CPU drain here, rather than byte swapping. 

that is what is our concern: we want to sent scientific data structures 
in such way that it is efficient both network bandwidth and CPU and that 
implies to support directly writing unchanged binary including not 
changing IEEE reps and endianess so that pieces of metadata must be 
included in binary XML ...

> Try doing this for billions of floats, gulp. 


> Hence one would need to ship arrays of doubles in IEEE floating point 
> representation or native format to avoid string conversions, perhaps 
> most appropriately as an "attachment" according to the various related 
> standards out there. 

i am looking what would it take to do it with MTOM/XOP but second 
possibility is to have extensible binary XML that would allow to include 
directly into the representation IEEE floats with appropriate metadata 
to reconstruct their string representation if needed (for apps that 
needs pure XML view)

> When working with a binary representation, one could also extend 
> DOM-like APIs in somewhat counter-intuitive manners, with subclasses 
> like DoubleArrayText, converting from double to IEEE floating point 
> and back, or similar.

i am more concerned about "standard" binary XML format that can do this 
than APIs

>> we did lot of work in past related to XML performance (in Indiana 
>> University and Binghamton) and are very concerned that whatever 
>> binary XML will be characterized/standardized in W3C will be of no 
>> much use for scientific computing and grids ...
> You would need strong advocates/evangelists, it seems.

scientific and business worlds seems sometimes quite disconnected in 
their requirements about XML ...



The best way to predict the future is to invent it - Alan Kay


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS