[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Can you give me the input XML and expected output so I can see whether XQuery really takes 4 times less code than E4X or C-Omega? In fact, I have an article due this month and that would be an interesting topic to cover.
--
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM
There is nothing more satisfying that having someone take a shot at you, and miss.
________________________________
From: Jonathan Robie [mailto:jonathan.robie@datadirect.com]
Sent: Thu 12/2/2004 9:06 AM
To: Dare Obasanjo
Cc: Daniela Florescu; Michael Champion; xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] XML-aware programming language?
Dare Obasanjo wrote:
> Exactly, that's why as a programmer I'd rather stick with the
> language I'm doing most of the application development with anyway
> (i.e. C#, Javascript, etc) as opposed to dealing with the [familiar]
> complexity of that language plus all the idiosyncracies of XQuery &
> XML Schema as well.
Hi Dare,
For the examples I've compared, I wind up writing about 4 times as much
code using that approach, and it definitely takes more time to write and
maintain that code.
|
