[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Subject: Re: [xml-dev] [newbie] Mapping a Map 101?
- From: PA <petite.abeille@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 00:27:47 +0100
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:return-path:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=kktlgDrWST3RpXjd9RELGyZPd8vcQe+Ud+019DUkcKcY1Q7oQpIpPxdW1HlZMUKlX0A9s3yVfrC/sxWD/zztW8tK1+8voRCQRTlwuLLQHRhA8nUi5SzvI0BOCB9k0ktzplEnmwCl0KmbwBdrmVCS9nTzs9tLEavL0w1kKqrH0w8=
- In-reply-to: <E1Cctu1-0006fh-00@ukmail1.eechost.net>
- References: <E1Cctu1-0006fh-00@ukmail1.eechost.net>
On Dec 11, 2004, at 00:10, Michael Kay wrote:
>> Is there a more or less "agreed upon" scheme to define a map type
>> structure in XML?
>
> No.
Bummer :/
I would have thought that such a structure would have been pretty
common by now, no?
> I tend to use <entry key="key">value</entry> probably because it uses
> only
> two names and I have trouble thinking of names.
I see.
In my case, keys can be of any type, so I'm not quite sure if using an
element attribute would work...
How would I express the following if using element attributes?
<map>
<entry>
<key>
<collection>
<string>Compound</string>
<string>Key</string>
</collection>
</key>
<value>
<integer>101</integer>
</value>
</entry>
</map>
Thanks!
Cheers,
PA.
|
