[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
> Java is not assembler.
I agree, Java over SAX or STAX is not assembler, as far I am concerned
it's worse then assembler :-) At least assembler had some beauty,
and you could really write astute programs with it.
Remark it is not the Java that I have problems with, it's simply the
combination
Java over SAX or STAX. It's a high level language over a too low level
(i.e bit-level)
API, it makes no sense architecturally to me.
Of course Java over SAX or STAX is a good way to implement XQuery or
XSLT runtimes, but not to write end applications for XML information
processing.
I guess we'll have to agree to disagree and move on. If you like to
write
(and rewrite :-) applications like this for fun, I guess I'm not gone
be able
to convince you, right ? :-)
> XSLT can be mind-boggling complex.
Did you try XQuery ? I strongly encourage you to try at least one
of those higher level XML processing languages; you might appreciate
the advantages. And if you think they don't solve your problem, I would
like to
understand more about your problem and why weren't they good enough.
Best regards
Dana
>
> --
> Alan Gutierrez - alan@engrm.com
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>
>
|
