[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
I think the spec is quite clear that you can validly derive xs:string by
restriction from union(xs:string, ...)
Generally, if XMLSpy differs from Xerces, XMLSpy is usually wrong.
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David P. Nesbitt [mailto:david_p_nesbitt@yahoo.com]
> Sent: 10 January 2005 15:17
> To: Michael Kay; xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject: RE: [xml-dev] XML Syntax for XQuery 1.0 (XQueryX) invalid?
>
> Michael,
>
> Thanks for the response.
>
> --- Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> wrote:
>
> > The schema is valid according to Xerces, XSV, and
> > Saxon. What exactly is
> > XMLSpy complaining about?
>
> XMLSpy complains about the stringConstantExpr. It
> highlights the <xsd:element name="value"
> type="xsd:string"/> and says:
>
> "Simple type 'xs:string' is not validly derived from
> 'constantValueType'."
>
> http://apps.gotdotnet.com/xmltools/xsdvalidator/Default.aspx
> says the following:
>
> Validation error:
>
> Invalid particle derivation by restriction. An error
> occurred at , (75, 3).
> Invalid particle derivation by restriction. An error
> occurred at , (93, 3).
> Invalid particle derivation by restriction. An error
> occurred at , (66, 3).
> Invalid particle derivation by restriction. An error
> occurred at , (84, 3).
>
> I am interested on what you think of these errors.
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone.
> http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo
>
|
