Lists Home |
Date Index |
- To: <email@example.com>
- Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Why associate an attribute with a namespace ?
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:45:45 -0800
- Cc: <email@example.com>
- Thread-index: AcUUeMGT7wYcym7GQFqO3y16Iez4pwAACmHQ
- Thread-topic: [xml-dev] Why associate an attribute with a namespace ?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 2:42 PM
> To: Dare Obasanjo
> Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Why associate an attribute with a namespace ?
> >So if I see _type in a document how do I know whether it is
> >xlink:type or daresfunkysemantics:type? If you are going to
> attempt to
> >argue on this list about XML and namespaces it would behoove you to
> >understand the problem space first before criticizing existing
> Let me ask first: have you read the entire thread, or
> just the last post ?
I have but obviously you have either failed to read or understand the
responses people have made to your comments.
> Namespace are necessary for elements, there is no doubpt
> about it. But an attribute only has meaning embedded in an
> element. Namespaces allows you to uniquely identify elements.
> From elements you can reach the attributes. You cannot access
> the attributes without their enclosing element anyway.
> Let me put the problem from another perspective: is it
> useful to have element A in namespace AAA and its attribute B
> in namespace BBB ?
Considering that it is a widespread practice in various XML technologies
today, it would seem the answer is Yes.
Anyway, I have work to do so you can enjoy trolling someone else.
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM
No matter how long or how hard you shop for an item, after you've bought
it, it will be on sale somewhere cheaper.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no