[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Razvan MIHAIU wrote:
> What about the reasons for this change ? Does it have anything to do
> with CDATA sections (as I suspect) ? Did they change it so that CDATA
> sections will be less useful ? I know that CDATA sections are even more
> general - you can have unescaped ampersands - practically any kind of
> markup except "]]" but the new type could replace CDATA sections in some
> circumstances.
No. The content still has to be well-formed XML. anyType doesn't mean
anyThing.
Bob Foster
|