[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
> I think the benefits to a single URI are few when compared with the
> benefits of having many (well, one per resource anyhow 8-);
Yes, you've said this before (e.g., [1]). I've explained why the drawbacks
sometimes outweigh the benefits ([2]). As best as I can understand it,
your response is "I'm sure I'm right" [3]. This post to which I'm
responding, [4], follows the same flawless[*] logic.
So far, only Joe Gregorio has tried ([5], and the followups between he and
I) to address the issues I raised in [2] with facts and architecture
discussions. I don't think they work, but he seems to be the only one
trying. I hope he continues; HTTP and REST would benefit greatly even if
they got only one of reliability or end-to-end security.
/r$
[1] http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200503/msg00438.html
[2] http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200503/msg00440.html
[3] http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200503/msg00443.html
[4] http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200504/msg00214.html
[5] http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200503/msg00448.html
[*] Literally; it is impossible to argue against, so it is without
flaw. It's value, however, is another matter. :)
--
Rich Salz Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
|
