xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] XML-enabled databases, XQuery APIs

Re: [xml-dev] XML-enabled databases, XQuery APIs

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] XML-enabled databases, XQuery APIs
From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 17:16:33 -0400
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=cCk8zHEPFLsj87ug8+lBzoB3L1tknBbX7vBnQ1iY7reJzjvKO9/1cp9CSu39VFsOWunvqxdFnUjiY69Heo5iwOGwAVZb6cDP8X+3O8s3cfwIih5P3Cpk29zgHgF7kV51X96vKv8DpUOM4k+477quTFO4GT29MT6gETFwHlH6mF4=
In-reply-to: <e3a5cb2c05041814026d7527d2@mail.gmail.com>
References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE07206E4F@hq1.pcmail.ingr.com> <e3a5cb2c05041814026d7527d2@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@gmail.com>

On 4/18/05, Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> That's our position.

By that I mean it's my position, and I think it's Michael Rys
position.  I don't speak for MS in any official capacity on this, and
our minds are wide-open to actual evidence that a standard binary XML
format could be fast, small, support XQuery, be better for SOAP than
XML is, support generic well-formed  XML somehow, and do all that well
enough to make the disruption worthwhile.

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] XML-enabled databases, XQuery APIs
  - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@intergraph.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] XML-enabled databases, XQuery APIs
  - From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] XML-enabled databases, XQuery APIs
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] XML-enabled databases, XQuery APIs
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] XML-enabled databases, XQuery APIs
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] XML-enabled databases, XQuery APIs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread