Lists Home |
Date Index |
* Uche Ogbuji <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2005-04-27 22:48]:
> On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 19:55 -0400, Alan Gutierrez wrote:
> > When a site is not updated at all for five years, and the
> > e-mail addresses attached to the site are unresponsive, then
> > XUpdate both looks and sounds like an "abandoned" duck.
> > > I am concerned about one thing. XUpdate needs a usable mailing
> > > list. I'm at least grateful to this thread for making me think
> > > about that. I certainly have no stake in XUpdate, but I like it
> > > enough that maybe I should...
> > I set one up last year at email@example.com and it should still
> > be up and running.
> Well, since the topic comes up again, what I have to say about it is
> I did find that a lot of the implementations still point to the old/dead
> site in their docs. And I admit I do see how that gives people some
> reason for thinking the project is dead.
> I hope I've demonstrated that it isn't. We'll see if we can't make that
> fact the more clear.
Thanks for this. Good resource.
Alan Gutierrez - firstname.lastname@example.org