[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
This > 2) To reply to David(2): Vector models are informative.
There is a lot
we can do without XML such as is being done with your gmail. Discussions
of the models can open up innovation. It's always worth discussing.
is worth discussing...
This > David Lyon <david.lyon@computergrid.net>
is not.
On 5/2/05, Bullard, Claude L (Len) <len.bullard@intergraph.com> wrote:
> 1) To reply to David(1): I don't think that, but it seemed a waste of time
>
> to put tags around it or more smilies. OTOH, black boxes are a pretty good
> place to hide bad processes. Simply hooking up SOAs won't change that.
> The idea that Sarbanes-Oxley is amenable to SOA is interesting. If ever
> there was an architectural challenge, that is one.
>
> 2) To reply to David(2): Vector models are informative. There is a lot
> we can do without XML such as is being done with your gmail. Discussions
> of the models can open up innovation. It's always worth discussing.
>
> So kill the chicken AND the duck. Keep the meat.
>
> len
>
> From: M. David Peterson [mailto:m.david.x2x2x@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 5:24 PM
>
> I'll chip in a hundred just to kill this thread right here and now...
>
--
<M:D/>
:: M. David Peterson ::
XML & XML Transformations, C#, .NET, and Functional Languages Specialist
|
