OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help



   Re: [xml-dev] Why XML for Messaging?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

> and other nits are elaborated, but at the end, the same
> answer 'because it is there' or 'there are no attractive
> alternatives' are given.  Laziness or just momentum?

"There are no attractive alternatives" holds most true, I suspect.
Laziness maybe of folks to come up with something thats actually
better, if anything.

>That XML will be replaced eventually
> is almost certain given it's inefficiencies for this
> particular application. 

How about "the *use* of XML will be replaced eventually..." XML is
about far more than messaging.

> o  A simpler XML?

Other than schema, could it get much simplier, really?

> o  A smarter XML?

That I agree with.

> o  Binary XML

And that's more simple?

> o  Objects

Wait, I thought this was a conversation about messaging, not about
sending serialized object graphs. You'd do one or the other, not both.

At least I would. Others would too.

Kent Tegels
Blog: http://staff.develop.com/ktegels


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS