xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Why XML for Messaging?

Re: [xml-dev] Why XML for Messaging?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Liam Quin <liam@w3.org>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Why XML for Messaging?
From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 15:26:54 -0400
Cc: Ken North <kennorth@sbcglobal.net>, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <20050601184012.GB1518@w3.org>
References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE07206FA3@hq1.pcmail.ingr.com> <429DEA93.7010502@datapower.com> <001201c566d0$72aae400$1601a8c0@DURANTE> <20050601184012.GB1518@w3.org>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040421

> A story I sometimes tell...
> 
> Suppose you work at a large bank, and are tasked with implementing
>...
> around each field, and they smile happily and say "six weeks". :-)

And right-justified without extra spaces!  Cool...

-- 
Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology                           http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway   http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html

References:
- Why XML for Messaging?
  - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@intergraph.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Why XML for Messaging?
  - From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Why XML for Messaging?
  - From: "Ken North" <kennorth@sbcglobal.net>
- Re: [xml-dev] Why XML for Messaging?
  - From: Liam Quin <liam@w3.org>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Why XML for Messaging?
Next by Date: Ignorable Whitespace in Fragments
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Why XML for Messaging?
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Why XML for Messaging?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread