xml-dev - RE: [xml-dev] Why XML for Messaging?

RE: [xml-dev] Why XML for Messaging?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <len.bullard@intergraph.com>
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Why XML for Messaging?
From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 20:56:41 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: 'Chiusano Joseph' <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>, "'xml-dev@lists.xml.org'" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE07206FBC@hq1.pcmail.ingr.com>

> I'll bet a beer:  when we finally get Longhorn and
> look under the covers, we'll discover MS optimized
> the blazes out of some XML pieces by subsetting it
> and being very persnickety about substitutions.

I betcha the SOAP stack is optimized to leave out DTD's.
I have no inside knowledge.
	/r$

-- 
Rich Salz                  Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology       http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway  http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] Why XML for Messaging?
  - From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@gmail.com>

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Why XML for Messaging?
  - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@intergraph.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Why XML for Messaging?
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Why XML for Messaging?
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Why XML for Messaging?
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Why XML for Messaging?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread