xml-dev - RE: [xml-dev] Is Web 2.0 the new XML?

RE: [xml-dev] Is Web 2.0 the new XML?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: 'Alan Gutierrez' <alan-xml-dev@engrm.com>
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@intergraph.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 15:55:48 -0500
Cc: "'martind@netfolder.com'" <martind@netfolder.com>, 'Gerald Bauer' <gerald.bauer@mac.com>, xml-dev@lists.xml.org

Use a false argument such as "teach the controversy" 
to get political action for an issue in which there is 
only one side.

It's boobery. I'm voting for a woman in the next 
presidential election.  Two boobs are better than one.

len


From: 'Alan Gutierrez' [mailto:alan-xml-dev@engrm.com]
    
    What do you think the web will do in the theatre of the absurd
    that isn't being done in the real world already?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
  - From: 'Alan Gutierrez' <alan-xml-dev@engrm.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Web 2.0 Case Study - Apple Dashboard Widgets - Beyond The Browser
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread