[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
* Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> [2005-08-16 07:59]:
> Alan Gutierrez wrote:
> > WHAT LICENSE???
> In situations like this where your product depends critically on
> an existing 3rd party library, it's simplest for everyone if you
> just pick the same license as the 3rd party product. I think
> Saxon's license is MPL. I'd just go with that.
Last I checked, the Saxon license was MPL 1.0 which, last I
checked, was for some reason, incompatible with Apache License
1.1 and 2.0. Thus, the Apache projects will not redistrbute Saxon.
I've narrowed it down to BSD, M.I.T. and Apache, since these are
licenses that are compatible with the Apache license.
--
Alan Gutierrez - alan@engrm.com
- http://engrm.com/blogometer/index.html
- http://engrm.com/blogometer/rss.2.0.xml
|
