RE: [xml-dev] Is Web 2.0 the new XML?

[Vladimir Gapeyev <vgapeyev@seas.upenn.edu>]

On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:

> There are more failures from the self-constituted groups of amateur 
> standards writers than there are successes.  You are going to quote back 
> to me the few notable successes from the amateurs but they are fewer 
> than their counterparts.  Don't confuse myth for math.

I presume hard numbers are what tells apart myth from math.  Are there any 
numbers to back up this claim?  (That's a question out of genuine -- even 
though amateur -- interest, really!)

Vladimir