[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
> In SAX, no namespace, or the default namespace, is represented
> by the empty string. Closer to the set way of looking at things.
Actually, the use of null versus an empty string is very inconsistent in
SAX. Karl Waclawek has reported many such areas across various
callbacks-- but the variety of interpretation in implementations is more
troublesome. Ultimately it leads to people sticking with one SAX parser
(no switching) and checking the expected case, or checking both cases to
remain parser agnostic...
All the best,
Jeff Rafter
|
