xml-dev - RE: [xml-dev] Names As Types

RE: [xml-dev] Names As Types

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "XML Developers List" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Names As Types
From: "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@allette.com.au>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:06:01 +1000 (EST)
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE072072FB@hq1.pcmail.ingr.com>
References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE072072FB@hq1.pcmail.ingr.com>
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2

Bullard, Claude L (Len) said:
> So the bottom turtle is strictly syntax.  XML
> has no application semantics.  This we know.

My point is that the second turtle is missing!
This is creating difficulties for the others.

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Names As Types
  - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@intergraph.com>

Prev by Date: Substitution Groups - Use 'em or lose 'em?
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Substitution Groups - Use 'em or lose 'em?
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Names As Types
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Names As Types
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread