[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
If you want to have a real say in the matter - become a specification or
standards author.
Dgc
Darryl G. Champagne
-----Original Message-----
From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:len.bullard@intergraph.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 12:21 PM
To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: [xml-dev] Client XML vs Message XML
At some point, it is necessary to confront the
specification and standards authors and make
them understand that object-oriented client
design and message or document (really, say
data) XML design aren't the same thing and
are bad practice to conflate. The results
of conflating these are very big honkin'
schemas that beggar the implementation,
don't get market traction, and cause the
unwary agency to spend a lot of taxpayer
dollars on projects that don't get good
results fast.
XML doesn't know about semantics or object-oriented
objects, and it's a crummy way to declare
a client specification for much beyond the
bits on the wire. Using it to advance the cause
of object-oriented databases ahead of their time
is a profoundly bad idea. It just makes the pig mad.
len
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>
|
