[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Robert Koberg wrote:
> The problem is not with 'inherent insecurities of script languages
> inside content', it is with whoever maintains the server system. In
> other words, I think you are looking at the wrong culprit.
Indeed. But new technologies, or new uses of existing tech, often
present unforseeable risks. We've always stressed that RSS isn't the
place for 'active content' that would require scripting. Precisely
because of past experience with abusing embedded content (ask me about
beaming newton notes sometime!)
Not because it's not a cool idea but because the extant tools don't do a
very good job of warding off the inevitable foolishness it'd bring. It
was more a stop-gap against the advertising nitwits wanting to graft
pop-up ads than anything else. No sense in having the emerging concept
wrecked by allowing that rabble to bring along the same mess they've
made of browsers.
Having scripted content seems like a fine idea, just not one that's
welcome in RSS at this point in time. I don't see the prevailing
opinion changing anytime soon either.
As for 3D worlds inside of RSS that'd only be dependent upon a tool
supporting the inclusion of that sort of content. Which would be best
served by being embedded as it's own modular element. Not as a
bastardization of an existing element type. Make a module, promote it's
use and get a client to understand it. The last being the hardest, of
course.
-Bill Kearney
Syndic8.com
|
