xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Better design: "flatter is better" or "nesting isbetter" ?

Re: [xml-dev] Better design: "flatter is better" or "nesting isbetter" ?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Better design: "flatter is better" or "nesting isbetter" ?
From: Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 10:37:06 +0100
Cc: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>, XML Developers List <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
In-reply-to: <cc159a4a0509301234533910b3@mail.gmail.com>
References: <827BC324B431954A855DC4E39E71B02874BDF0@IMCSRV5.MITRE.ORG> <cc159a4a0509301234533910b3@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: davep@dpawson.co.uk

On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 14:34 -0500, Peter Hunsberger wrote:

> 
> 3) presentation specific structures that reflect some (perhaps
> abstract) denormalized, hierarchical presentation model.

I don't know of any hierarchical presentation models Peter, do you?
Unless you mean docbook or similar, which I don't see as presentation
layer.

Most of the presentation formats I know of are pretty flat.

regards DaveP.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] Better design: "flatter is better" or "nesting is better" ?
  - From: Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@gmail.com>

Next by Date: Advice on WYSIWYG XSLT designer for ERP forms printing
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Better design: "flatter is better" or "nesting is better" ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread