OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

 


 

   Relax-ng test suites & sample data?; Pre-pre-announce: relax-ng subtype

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]
  • To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
  • Subject: Relax-ng test suites & sample data?; Pre-pre-announce: relax-ng subtype checker
  • From: Dan Shoutis <dan.shoutis@gmail.com>
  • Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:48:12 -0600
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=lu0SDVCNli9utzhrDnq4W1EiyMciJ/D+Zd1tzNji2mx1A9c9YmHGynJw70BAvPaHh8zvLMGTfZ/lZA2EOLqXflrpV+SRysk26sOt8DbE3pi4owdd75k5azizEvdFhnGlOjkB7mqIIpl4CIa7V4JNyVySY9I0jIY3fqALoZVwRaE=

Hello to all,

First: This is my first post here so apologies in advance for any breaches of etiquette.

I was wondering if someone could point me at any repositories of schemas accompanied by valid & invalid instances, with emphasis on relax-ng validation and preferably leaving out extra complexities such as external (even xsd) datatype validation. The test suite put together by James Clark & linked from relaxng.org is a decent start, but focuses fairly heavily on parsing/normalization, and I'm targeting only the simplified syntax.

Additionally, I'd like to let anyone who is interested know that I'm in the process of building a (toy) relax-ng subtype checker: given two simple-syntax grammars a and b, it can check that all instances matched by a will also be matched by b (that is, a <= b). (Since it's trivial to construct a grammar that matches only a specific instance document, it can also perform validation ... hence, the first part of this message!)

Current status:
- regular hedge grammar subtype prover roughed-out and tested against toy examples; needs lots of refinement.
- simplified rng parser 70% or so. (It's parsing the grammars that I'm using in my job.)
- lots of longer range stuff in "idea" form (there's nothing preventing an implementation of subtype relations on xml schema part II, for example); however to be completely honest I probably won't have any more time for this project once it works well enough for my needs :)

The usefulness of such a thing, at least for me, is in constructing "toy languages" for producing/processing XML that can be proved to always work with valid instances. My working example, and the prime motivator of this whole ball of pasta, is a simple DB->XML mapping template language.

A few closing bits:
a) Has anyone done anything similar (not counting internal type-checking of XDuce & co.)? If it's more ready for prime-time, I'd be happy to drop this and use that!
b) This is unlikely, but if not (a) does anyone have a collection of test examples of grammars that should satisfy a subtype relation?
c) If anyone wants to contribute, either with test cases, code (Full disclosure: I'm using ocaml) or even doing a formal verification of the prover, they are very, very welcome to. If I ever release anything, it will be under a suitably hippy license.

Thanks to all for the time & tips.
-- Dan




 

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS