Lists Home |
Date Index |
> Potential bug in Saxon 8.5.1: I noticed that it does not fire an
> UPA error for the above scenario; on the other hand it does fire the
> error if the @ref attributes are substituted for @name attributes.
> A "different/same element declaration" issue?
Yes, Saxon is testing only that the element declaration is unambiguously
identified; if two distinct particles refer to the same declaration, Saxon
doesn't report an error. It's a known and published limitation of Saxon that
it doesn't implement this bug in the spec ;-)