Lists Home |
Date Index |
Well ecmascript DOM and CSS have been standardised, I think that hits
a large bit of the macro needs. behaviors are in some way under
I would think that the office application most discardable/replacable
by some confluence of HTML and associated standards would be Slideshow
Followed by Word Processor
Followed by what?
On 11/29/05, Peter Hunsberger <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 11/29/05, Bullard, Claude L (Len) <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > Spy Vs Spy aside for the moment, and following the thought experiment at Tim
> > Bray's blog:
> > How much of a common word processing format subset is represented by HTML?
> > How much isn't? How much could be added by namespaced behaviors?
> > IOW, don't we have one of these?
> Interesting question. Early in my career I spent a lot of time with
> SGML. Given that the target in those days was document publishing I
> don't think there where many constructs missing that Word it it's kin
> would possess with the exception of behaviours. When HTML came along
> I was first surprised that so many of the SGML constructs had made it
> into the spec. but there where also times when I found things missing
> that I sort of wanted.
> How much is missing? I bet I have an IBM SGML reference card in my
> attic somewhere, building the feature checklist would be easy...
> However, the need for macros and behaviours would be all new (to
> standardised HTML), so although it might be a good starting point, I
> somehow doubt that it's the end point? I suspect you're still going
> to have some battles to win before any new standard emerges.
> Peter Hunsberger
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>