[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 16:56 -0800, Nathan Young -X (natyoung - Artizen
at Cisco) wrote:
> On the flip side I'd certainly want to avoid using XHTML + semantics
> tunneled through attributes for anything that wasn't already and always
> to be a web page... hence my objection to boom, and to XHTML used as a
> WP format.
A ha. This in a nutshell is my position. Violent agreement.
--
Uche Ogbuji Fourthought, Inc.
http://uche.ogbuji.net http://fourthought.com
http://copia.ogbuji.net http://4Suite.org
Articles: http://uche.ogbuji.net/tech/publications/
|