[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
I did try this solution, but it gave the error:
org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: cos-nonambig: "http://www.polopoly.com/
polopoly/cm/app/xml":major and "http://www.polopoly.com/polopoly/cm/
app/xml":major (or elements from their substitution group) violate
"Unique Particle Attribution". During validation against this schema,
ambiguity would be created for those two particles.
Niels Peter
Den 16/12/2005 kl. 18.11 skrev Michael Kay:
>> However, if the complex type were changed to look as
>> follows:
>>
>>>>> <xs:complexType name="contentiddef">
>>>>> <xs:choice>
>>>>> <xs:choice minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
>>>>> <xs:element ref="x:externalid"/>
>>>>> <xs:element ref="x:major"/>
>>>>> </xs:choice>
>>>>> <xs:choice minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
>>>>> <xs:element ref="x:major"/>
>>>>> <xs:element ref="x:minor"/>
>>>>> <xs:element ref="x:version"/>
>>>>> </xs:choice>
>>>>> </xs:choice>
>>>>> </xs:complexType>
>>
>> the XML schema processor would know which choice set it is in when it
>> encounters a "major" element because if it first encountered an
>> "externalID" element (which must remain mandatory - as it is
>> above - in
>> order for this to work) it knows that it must be in the first choice
>> set; otherwise, it must be in the second.
>
> I don't think so. The model here is ((e|ma)* | (ma|mi|v)*), and
> content
> consisting of a single "ma" element would match either branch.
>
> Michael Kay
> http://www.saxonica.com/
>
>
|