[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Subject: MusicXML 1.1 saving from Sibelius; XML document adoption rates?
- From: Michael Good <musicxml@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 16:34:35 -0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=sFFseyK+X5w0bqT2a0tuUHQ+KiKVBSUCRzWtCSyM4HMfK1vUxV5tbnVEv0WA2v/VAmFjioXLOLENHVBpwROuzOPexxQ9O2dZfM54LJTKyn+ZU2QPoz85DD7hdM8muYWm3jUtidUEdCeFizz0OlY/sk3OgR3d53ocXcdgfwcueH8=
Today Recordare released our Dolet 3 for Sibelius plug-in. It allows the Sibelius 4 music notation program to save MusicXML 1.1 files so they can be shared with people who use Finale, Notion, and many other music notation programs. More information is available at:
With this release, people can now use the MusicXML 1.1 format to exchange editable files between the two main market leaders in music notation software (Finale and Sibelius) with a higher level of fidelity than has ever been possible.
We now have 50 applications supporting the MusicXML format - including the commercial market leaders, innovative new products, and open source projects. So I am curious as to how MusicXML measures up against other document-oriented XML projects. Are there studies that compare adoption rates of XML document formats by software in different application areas? Pointers to such work would be most welcome!
I hope everyone has a great holiday season and new year.
Best regards,
Michael Good
Recordare LLC
| 