[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- To: Richard Lainchbury <freexe@gmail.com>
- Subject: Re: [xml-dev] [Summary] Best Practice for URI construction?
- From: Philippe Poulard <Philippe.Poulard@sophia.inria.fr>
- Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 16:09:48 +0100
- Cc: Pete Cordell <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com>, "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>, XML Developers List <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- In-reply-to: <2cbc8d0a0512210816v610dd5aan@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <B8415163A689094689542C617ECA03665836EE@IMCSRV5.MITRE.ORG> <002701c60647$1c6fee20$b100a8c0@RW> <2cbc8d0a0512210816v610dd5aan@mail.gmail.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050511
hi, and happy new year
Richard Lainchbury wrote:
> I presume that it is a illegal uri, but my thoughts are that it should
> be obvious enough not to be need.
>
> http://www.example.com/country:US/state:MA/city:Boston
your browser will have some troubles if it has to resolve relative URIs
for example, resolving state:MA/city:Boston upon
http://www.example.com/country:US/ will fail : your browser should warn
you that the scheme "state" is unknown
moreover, this relative URI is not one : it is an opaque URI, not a
hierarchical one
--
Cordialement,
///
(. .)
-----ooO--(_)--Ooo-----
| Philippe Poulard |
-----------------------
http://reflex.gforge.inria.fr
|
