xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Will The Real SOA Please Sit Down?

Re: [xml-dev] Will The Real SOA Please Sit Down?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Will The Real SOA Please Sit Down?
From: Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:17:31 -0800
Cc: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@intergraph.com>, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=KQmH/Y3UQXBbpOzjPlbv/UexY3Os4K65yCEfNa++vKJLRvGGvjOzRXVUC970l1dgzj/ysgD5NYed6tb/8DTrcHXe5UH7+nGXBzcds5z90cuYKAQabxodQ+/NCDuMpDKeLhxB7nzZlz5f6j6EpUM+E72edVh6u/0nwrnKxL1WGZ8=
In-reply-to: <OFFA35C5AA.A6B8A3D0-ON852570F2.0059D283-852570F2.005A17C5@us.ibm.com>
References: <200601101540.k0AFeZ8n003797@e4.ny.us.ibm.com> <OFFA35C5AA.A6B8A3D0-ON852570F2.0059D283-852570F2.005A17C5@us.ibm.com>

On 1/10/06, Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> Given the following definitions,
>
> o Which is more wrong than the others.
>
> o Which is the least useful?

http://www.bartleby.com/63/93/1793.html

Richard,

So are you implying that SOA and pornography are equivalent here? ;-)

-- Kurt Cagle

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Will The Real SOA Please Sit Down?
  - From: Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Will The Real SOA Please Sit Down?
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Will The Real SOA Please Sit Down?
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Will The Real SOA Please Sit Down?
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Will The Real SOA Please Sit Down?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread