[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Why
not just:
<xs:choice> <xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="A" minOccurs="1"/>
<xs:element name="B" minOccurs="0"/> </xs:sequence> <xs:element name="B"
minOccurs="1"/>
</xs:choice>
Hope
that helps,
Priscilla
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Priscilla
Walmsley
http://www.datypic.com Author, Definitive XML
Schema (Prentice Hall PTR)
Definitive XQuery (coming in 2006) -----------------------------------------------------------------
Hello, I have a schema that
needs to require 1 of 2 elements, but also allow for both of them. So if the
elements are A & B, then A alone is valid, B alone is valid, A & B are
valid, but ~A & ~B is invalid.
I tried the following..
<xs:choice>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="A" minOccurs="1"/>
<xs:element name="B"
minOccurs="0"/>
</xs:sequence>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="A" minOccurs="0"/>
<xs:element name="B"
minOccurs="1"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:choice>
But this is not working as it makes the model
non-deterministic. Is there a way to solve this?
Thanks for your time and kind regards, Brian Gentry
|