Lists Home |
Date Index |
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: [xml-dev] maxoccurs='unbounded' under xsd:all group.
- From: Roxette Lurge <email@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:21:18 -0800 (PST)
- Cc: David Carlisle <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=MwsOfQ4xELoP1dObmuiCsSiDcmitD5KW3MtgAzZOJtfr6KLqfPSxAz19stoKs+bq50ulFQMiplL1HBQCdDqqcr4+VZrB8sTWHqVBe3LNYh/mVUAA2YQojyZTPnOt5VzUyyphMsPfJMeMTneNZFYYBgyoUEjP9PyqEDUg4XQd9nE= ;
- In-reply-to: <200601171705.RAA08038@penguin.nag.co.uk>
I have another 20 elements under Customer and all of
them are optional (minoccurs='0') and 2 of them are
repeatable, which, I guess, would make the DTD a bit
complicated by taking care of all the combinations.
I don't see any other way other than to change xml
structure to get rid of this issue.
--- David Carlisle <email@example.com> wrote:
> After all (with the limited knowledge of DTD I
> this is possible in dtd.
> with small examples like this you can write (in dtd
> which of course you could write in w3c schema syntax
> without using
> xsd:all. However this soon gets out of hand if the
> example is any
> This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by
> Star. The
> service is powered by MessageLabs. For more
> information on a proactive
> anti-virus service working around the clock, around
> the globe, visit:
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org
> <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> The list archives are at
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around