[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Hi Klaus,
Don't get me wrong, the participants we are trying to attract for this
project are people familiar with their field (as mentioned on the
site), experts included of course. But metadata is and will always be
a vast problem that touches everything; many people, technical and non-
technical, need to be involved. We think a wiki is the perfect
platform for sharing and producing a consistent evolving vocabulary.
- Dom
> Hi,
>
> Am 27.01.2006 um 20:43 schrieb Nathan Young -X ((natyoung - Artizen
> at Cisco)):
>
> >
> > To often we define expert as "someone who knows so much that they
no
> > longer need to take input" Often what is needed is a definition:
> > "Someone who is constantly changing their criteria for what kind of
> > input to pay most attention to and can effectively evaluate those
> > criteria"
>
> Physicists are a good example of experts, who are most of the time
> consistently correct in their statements, as I think. There are
> internationally installed, accepted and constant protocols for
> becoming and being an expert in physics. Fraud is detected in the
> long run at least. Its the same in technical disciplines based on
> physics. Here we have areas, where there is only a small difference
> between theory and practice - again: in the long run at least.
>
> Klaus
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>
>
>
>
--
|
