xml-dev - RE: [xml-dev] Did Documents Win? No. Objects Just Couldn't GetTheir A

RE: [xml-dev] Did Documents Win? No. Objects Just Couldn't GetTheir A

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <len.bullard@intergraph.com>
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Did Documents Win? No. Objects Just Couldn't GetTheir ActTogether.
From: Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 00:23:21 -0500
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE0BB1FEDF@hq1.ingr-corp.com>

> Why Federated instead of Confederated?  In other words, if 
> REST is Federated naming, you are saying it is centrally 
> administered.

That's just what the term was.  The federation may be as loose as the 
(virtual) wire that connects them.

        /r$

-- 
SOA Appliance Group
IBM Application Integration Middleware

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Did Documents Win? No. Objects Just Couldn't GetTheir Act Together.
  - From: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <len.bullard@intergraph.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Did Documents Win? No. Objects Just Couldn't GetTheir Act Together.
Next by Date: XML Fragments
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Did Documents Win? No. Objects Just Couldn't GetTheir Act Together.
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Did Documents Win? No. Objects Just Couldn't GetTheir Act Together.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS