[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Two Questions - on XML Schema
- From: David Carver <d_a_carver@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 14:19:23 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=6aOfWm2VffO4z8gJ8jbjIE0/f+ZB1JCbTZsJ/TtdwRA6r7zKdx0CwDxn4+cs8o3503IouUyP9EoQR9dxvU11u6epzaUTvRC3FXsxscIPj/TGV1PwIg0f/YqJ+JjRoHXCVoeWDth8Uk2D+UEmgJBIc/E6+h4IQzjVlTrhr4SDHzc= ;
- In-reply-to: <E1FHQT5-000736-83@aji.w3.org>
- References: <E1FHQT5-000736-83@aji.w3.org>
- Reply-to: d_a_carver@yahoo.com
- User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201)
Michael Kay wrote:
>> It is unclear how data binding tools would
>> support the conditional assignment of types. I'm not saying that it
>> couldn't be done but I've yet to seen anyone spell out how to
>> handle it.
>>
>
> Oh dear. If the data binding folks are going to be stakeholders in this, we
> can throw out all hopes of a clean design. They'll mess it up even worse
> than the relational people did.
>
> Michael Kay
> http://www.saxonica.com/
>
I'll have to second that opinion. I haven't seen an implementation of
xml schemas databinding that is flexible enough to deal with changes to
a schemas, without causing a lot of code rewrite.
|
