xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] DOM's javascript roots (was Re: [xml-dev] Have JDOM/ XOM /

Re: [xml-dev] DOM's javascript roots (was Re: [xml-dev] Have JDOM/ XOM /

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Michael Champion <michael.champion@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] DOM's javascript roots (was Re: [xml-dev] Have JDOM/ XOM / etc. failed?)
From: Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 20:23:19 -0400
Cc: XML Developers List <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
In-reply-to: <BAY107-W421A002FC1591FC143BEC99CB0@phx.gbl>
References: <BAY107-W421A002FC1591FC143BEC99CB0@phx.gbl>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201)

Michael Champion wrote:
> Seriously, DOM-the-standard's only reason to live these days is to make 
> portable browser -- oops, sorry "Web 2.0" -- apps easier to build, 
> right?  E4X seems like the way forward there, not DOM.

Make it happen big boy...

 > What am I
 > missing here?

ufff... must be fun...

References:
- RE: Re: [xml-dev] DOM's javascript roots (was Re: [xml-dev] HaveJDOM / XOM / etc. failed?)
  - From: "Michael Champion" <michael.champion@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Re: [xml-dev] DOM's javascript roots (was Re: [xml-dev] HaveJDOM / XOM / etc. failed?)
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] DOM's javascript roots (was Re: [xml-dev] Have JDOM / XOM / etc. failed?)
Previous by thread: RE: Re: [xml-dev] DOM's javascript roots (was Re: [xml-dev] HaveJDOM / XOM / etc. failed?)
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] DOM's javascript roots (was Re: [xml-dev] Have JDOM / XOM / etc. failed?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread