[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- To: XML Developers List <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Subject: Re: [xml-dev] DOM's javascript roots (was Re: [xml-dev] Have JDOM / XOM / etc. failed?)
- From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:11:07 -0400
- In-reply-to: <442D94E5.1040702@metalab.unc.edu>
- References: <20060331181515.52963.qmail@web32809.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <26B5424A-181E-4A13-B9DB-4E63AD738AB0@expway.fr> <442D7D27.8090204@metalab.unc.edu> <39BC73F5-3EFF-4C4D-81E8-8EEE5344AF25@expway.fr> <442D94E5.1040702@metalab.unc.edu>
On Mar 31, 2006, at 3:45 PM, Elliotte Harold wrote:
> Of course. No method overloading. Think createElement,
> createElementNS, etc. Java and C++ wouldn;t desing an API like that.
FWIW. This is as much an issue of supporting namespaces as anything
else... they're a wart that shouldn't have made it too.
That said, there were a lot of tradeoffs made, but again, it was a
case of good enough is good enough for the most part.
|
