[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Rick Jelliffe wrote:
>
> Because XML parsers are available in every language built-in, while LISP
> and scheme parser are not ubiquitous, have less good
> internationalization,
> encourage rather than discourage the addition of processing, and does
> not
> have validation languages.
Whereas, i am not claiming that both SXML and Scheme were last words in
datuments manipulation i would recommend a view to
[http://okmij.org/ftp/Scheme/SXML.html]
and specially to
[http://okmij.org/ftp/Scheme/xml.html]
The thread about XML syntax for XPath begins to be a bit hot ;-)
I would note that in the Scheme approach, SXPath is a SXML structure can
be analised, modified, and even automatically generated in the way than a
hypotetical XPathX would but with the advantages of a full programming
environment (Scheme).
Juan R.
Center for CANONICAL |SCIENCE)
|
