[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Rick,
Le jeudi 06 juillet 2006 à 16:57 +1000, Rick Jelliffe a écrit :
> Lots of good points.
>
> For the issue of supertype/subtype/inheritance, there are two aspects.
> One is whether the constraints can be expressed: and, indeed, the same
> constraints can be expressed and RELAX NG et al is more powerful than XSD.
>
> The second is whether constraints can be modeled using inheritance
> relationships. You are right that RELAX NG does not have any facilities
> for this (e.g. it has a facility called combine that can be used to do
> the same kind of thing that XSD substution groups does, but it is not a
> type-based mechanism.)
>
My posts are basically an angle brackets adorned version of these two
statements :) but I also wanted to show that this would be quite easy to
represent with annotations.
++++++++++
Le jeudi 06 juillet 2006 à 08:48 +0200, Eric van der Vlist a écrit :
> ooops... Just found out how substitution groups can be better translated
> in RELAX NG just after having pressed the send button.
I have consolidated these two posts in my blog:
http://eric.van-der-vlist.com/blog/2814_RELAX_NG_and_W3C_XML_Schema_compared_%28continued%29.item
Eric
--
GPG-PGP: 2A528005
Don't you think all these XML schema languages should work together?
http://dsdl.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
(ISO) RELAX NG ISBN:0-596-00421-4 http://oreilly.com/catalog/relax
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ceci est une partie de message=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
|
