[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
> There didn?t seem to be any objection to the assertion that HTML is
> the primary markup language for the visible Web, and that XML is not
> appropriate for the visible Web.
My problem with the assertion is that it seems tautological. It's like
saying 'most English speakers prefer English' -- if you're defining the
web through a browser-based (-biased? :) view, then anything other than
almost-all HTML would be quite surprising.
/r$
--
SOA Appliances
Application Integration Middleware
|