Re: [xml-dev] ID Conflicts in Namespaces.

["bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@gmail.com>]

> You could specify a thousand if you wanted, you would still have only
> One Schema. All those documents get mixed up and become a single
> grammar.

I suppose. But I wonder if the validation root will be understood the
same for all processors in these various scenarios?


>but it's still quite core to XML, which XML Schema
> certainly is not.
full agreement

> > As if this matter were underspecified for me.
>
> No, just cryptospecified :)
>

hmm, I guess one can have something cryptospecified and overspecified
- the overspecification making the matter cryptic, but we should hope
that if something is cryptic it can be clarified by further
explanation, not explained by cutting explanation out (although with
XML Schema that hope may be rather naive)  ;)



Cheers,
Bryan Rasmussen