XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
RE: [xml-dev] Xlink Isn't Dead

>          Hopefully, they'll get a clue, at some point, and 
> use the ideas behind XLink as a basis for putting link 
> behavior where it belongs -- in the styling languages. Then 
> the rest of us will be able to model our links however we want.

Actually, I don't think it belongs only in the styling languages. I think
the big mistake in XLink is a failure to recognize that there are two
separate things: a relationship between pieces of information, and a
navigable hyperlink. We've achieved the separation of content from
presentation in other areas, we just haven't achieved it for relationships.
The presentation forms do need better navigation facilities, and core XML
also needs (much) better facilities for modelling relationships.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS