Re: XML design of ((a and b) or c)

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]

From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com>
To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:27:05 +0000

I wrote:
> (a and b) or c
>
> could be designed as:
>
> <or>
>     <a>
>     <and>
>         <b/>
>         <c/>
>     </and>
> </or>

...or more correctly:

<or>
  <and>
    <a/>
    <b/>
  </and>
  <c/>
</or>

:)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML design of ((a and b) or c)
  - From: Mitch Amiano <mitch.amiano@agilemarkup.com>

References:
- XML design of ((a and b) or c)
  - From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com>

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]