[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
RE: [xml-dev] XML design of ((a and b) or c)
- From: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@xerox.com>
- To: "David Carlisle" <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:21:14 -0800
Let me clarify the XSLT point: XSLT defines functions such as current()
which are not in the XPath set.
Those functions are not prefixed. XForms and XSLT bear the same
relationship to XPath.
Leigh.
-----Original Message-----
From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@nag.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 4:19 PM
To: Klotz, Leigh
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] XML design of ((a and b) or c)
> On the nighmare issue, originally all XForms XPath extension functions
> were in the XForms namespace, but we removed that as a result of
public
> comments that showed that the XPath 1.0 Recommendation did not allow
> qualified names,
??? XPath1 (and now 2) specifies function names are QNames.
> and that neither XSLT nor XML Signature W3C
> recommendations specified qualified names as extension functions.
??? XSLT 1 mandates that all extension functions use qualified names
with
a non empty prefix. xslt 1 says:
If a FunctionName in a FunctionCall expression is not an NCName
(i.e. if it contains a colon), then it is treated as a call to an
extension function
> extension functions would be namespaced in XPath 2.0. But the botch
is
> with XPath 1.0 not allowing them.
In what way are they disallowed in XPath 1?
David
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]