Re: [ubl-dev] Mentioning codelist perculiarities...

["Stephen GOULD" <stephen.gould@halisa.net>]

Beautiful !

However there is a big difference between cock-ups and deliberate 
policy which is why the email response to you has been
placed on the web so others can review the historical facts
http://www.oic.org/z/XZIG/UNCEFACT/IXUAEN1.htm

Any comments particularly on how to resolve the issue within
EDIFACT-UN/CEFACT would be appreciated as the Tenders 
for the Melbourne Port and Victorian 32 Local Government Agencies
are critical for early 2007

WOULD IT BE ACCEPTABLE TO REPLACE THE FOLLOWING
DATA ELEMENTS IN THE "NAD" DATA SEGMENT

 1	CO58
2	CO80
3	CO59 

WITH THE COMPLEX VERSION OF AS 4590
http://www.oic.org/z/XZIG/AS4590/add/

Comments would be appreciated by 17:00 Wed 20 Dec Sydney time
for the eCommittee review Thu 21 Dec 2006

Thank you

Stephen GOULD 
Chair
XML & ECOMMERCE SPECIAL INTEREST GROUP

On 17 Dec 06, at 15:49, David RR Webber wrote:

> Came across this today - this is probably so the "enemy" does not know where
> the troops are - but then again - how do they get their mail?!?
> 
>  
> 
> http://www.usps.com/ncsc/lookups/usps_abbreviations.html 
> 
>  
> 
> and
> 
>  
> 
> 
> Military "State"
> 
> Abbreviation
> 
> 
> Armed Forces Africa 
> 
> AE
> 
> 
> Armed Forces Americas 
>   (except Canada)
> 
> AA
> 
> 
> Armed Forces Canada
> 
> AE
> 
> 
> Armed Forces Europe
> 
> AE
> 
> 
> Armed Forces Middle East
> 
> AE
> 
> 
> Armed Forces Pacific
> 
> AP
> 
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>