xml-dev

274 messages in this archive (listed by date, most recent first) | Thread Index

• RE: [xml-dev] Speed in Languages and Browser Architectures
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 1 Mar 2007 04:38:50 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Speed in Languages and Browser Architectures
  • From "Robert Koberg" <rob@koberg.com> on 28 Feb 2007 22:48:41 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Speed in Languages and Browser Architectures
  • From Rick Marshall <rjm@zenucom.com> on 28 Feb 2007 22:40:57 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Speed in Languages and Browser Architectures
  • From "Robert Koberg" <rob@koberg.com> on 28 Feb 2007 22:31:35 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Speed in Languages and Browser Architectures
  • From Rick Marshall <rjm@zenucom.com> on 28 Feb 2007 21:28:50 -0000
• Speed in Languages and Browser Architectures
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 28 Feb 2007 12:26:03 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Generic vs Specific WSDL
  • From Stefan Tilkov <info@tilkov.com> on 27 Feb 2007 20:48:21 -0000
• Re: When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware)
  • From Boris Kolpackov <boris@codesynthesis.com> on 27 Feb 2007 20:38:24 -0000
• Generic vs Specific WSDL
  • From David Carver <d_a_carver@yahoo.com> on 27 Feb 2007 20:28:14 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? BuyHardware)
  • From Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 27 Feb 2007 11:44:51 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] NoXML Binaries? Buy Hardware)
  • From "Stephen Green" <stephen.green@bristol.gov.uk> on 27 Feb 2007 09:52:17 -0000
• "Metalinks (XML format) Tries to Simplify Downloads"
  • From albryan@comcast.net on 27 Feb 2007 07:40:52 -0000
• AW: [xml-dev] Re: xsd to xml generation
  • From <joerg.moebius@hamburg.de> on 27 Feb 2007 05:55:21 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RDDL documents
  • From Paul Denning <pauld@mitre.org> on 26 Feb 2007 22:31:36 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: xsd to xml generation
  • From "Suresh Chandak" <sureshchandak@gmail.com> on 26 Feb 2007 22:09:11 -0000
• [ANN] last two days to submit proposals for XML Prague 2007
  • From Petr Cimprich <petr@gingerall.cz> on 26 Feb 2007 21:58:23 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XMLBinaries? Buy Hardware)
  • From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 26 Feb 2007 21:51:38 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware)
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 26 Feb 2007 21:31:26 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: xsd to xml generation
  • From Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> on 26 Feb 2007 20:26:08 -0000
• Re: xsd to xml generation
  • From "Suresh Chandak" <sureshchandak@gmail.com> on 26 Feb 2007 20:19:28 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] A Fun Business Idea
  • From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 26 Feb 2007 19:27:33 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] A Fun Business Idea
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 26 Feb 2007 19:24:29 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware)
  • From "David Megginson" <david.megginson@gmail.com> on 26 Feb 2007 19:16:41 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware)
  • From Tei <oscar.vives@gmail.com> on 26 Feb 2007 18:59:09 -0000
• Announce: Webswell Connect 2.0.6 - open source web servicesintegration tool is released
  • From Ladislav Urban <ladislav.urban@webswell.com> on 26 Feb 2007 16:11:57 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] A Fun Business Idea
  • From Stefan Tilkov <info@tilkov.com> on 26 Feb 2007 15:55:24 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? BuyHardware)
  • From Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 26 Feb 2007 15:48:05 -0000
• A Fun Business Idea
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 26 Feb 2007 14:39:43 -0000
• Announce:XPontus XML Editor 1.0.0RC2
  • From "Yves Zoundi" <yveszoundi@gmail.com> on 26 Feb 2007 13:45:22 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware)
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 26 Feb 2007 04:01:39 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware)
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 26 Feb 2007 03:55:26 -0000
• [ANN]VTD-XML 2.0
  • From "Harry Xu" <harry.hxu@gmail.com> on 26 Feb 2007 02:30:54 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XMLBinaries? Buy Hardware)
  • From Rick Marshall <rjm@zenucom.com> on 25 Feb 2007 21:31:00 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware)
  • From "Robert Koberg" <rob@koberg.com> on 25 Feb 2007 21:11:18 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware)
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 25 Feb 2007 20:03:11 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XMLBinaries? Buy Hardware)
  • From Ian Graham <ian.graham@utoronto.ca> on 25 Feb 2007 19:44:20 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware)
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 24 Feb 2007 22:45:33 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? BuyHardware)
  • From noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 24 Feb 2007 21:41:05 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware)
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 24 Feb 2007 21:24:07 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? BuyHardware)
  • From noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 24 Feb 2007 16:56:44 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware
  • From Wei Lu <welu@cs.indiana.edu> on 24 Feb 2007 15:54:06 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware)
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 24 Feb 2007 15:36:18 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? BuyHardware)
  • From noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 24 Feb 2007 14:36:20 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware)
  • From Stefan Tilkov <info@tilkov.com> on 24 Feb 2007 14:28:28 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? BuyHardware)
  • From noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 24 Feb 2007 14:19:22 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware)
  • From "Anne Thomas Manes" <atmanes@gmail.com> on 24 Feb 2007 12:53:27 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware)
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 24 Feb 2007 11:36:41 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware
  • From noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 23 Feb 2007 21:31:34 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware
  • From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 23 Feb 2007 19:48:57 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] better (?) than DOM
  • From "Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)" <natyoung@cisco.com> on 23 Feb 2007 19:34:59 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware
  • From "derek denny-brown" <zuligag@gmail.com> on 23 Feb 2007 18:44:10 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware
  • From noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 23 Feb 2007 16:02:15 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware
  • From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 23 Feb 2007 15:28:39 -0000
• When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware)
  • From "David Megginson" <david.megginson@gmail.com> on 23 Feb 2007 15:09:53 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 23 Feb 2007 13:31:08 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware
  • From Robin Berjon <robin@joost.com> on 23 Feb 2007 13:01:11 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware
  • From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 23 Feb 2007 12:33:54 -0000
• Fwd: Re: [xml-dev] better (?) than DOM
  • From "Robert Koberg" <rob@koberg.com> on 23 Feb 2007 12:33:22 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] better (?) than DOM
  • From Robin Berjon <robin@joost.com> on 23 Feb 2007 12:02:50 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware
  • From "Anne Thomas Manes" <atmanes@gmail.com> on 23 Feb 2007 12:01:08 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] better (?) than DOM
  • From Robin Berjon <robin@joost.com> on 23 Feb 2007 11:59:39 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] better (?) than DOM
  • From Manos Batsis <manos_lists@geekologue.com> on 23 Feb 2007 11:58:25 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware
  • From Robin Berjon <robin@joost.com> on 23 Feb 2007 11:58:22 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware
  • From Robin Berjon <robin@joost.com> on 23 Feb 2007 11:54:44 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] better (?) than DOM
  • From Robin Berjon <robin@joost.com> on 23 Feb 2007 11:51:34 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware
  • From Robin Berjon <robin@joost.com> on 23 Feb 2007 11:49:12 -0000
• Re. Last Call Working Draft Review for XForms 1.1
  • From "Stephen Green" <stephen.green@bristol.gov.uk> on 23 Feb 2007 10:28:24 -0000
• xsd to xml generation
  • From "Suresh Chandak" <sureshchandak@gmail.com> on 23 Feb 2007 02:52:07 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] better (?) than DOM
  • From "derek denny-brown" <zuligag@gmail.com> on 23 Feb 2007 02:16:36 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware
  • From David Lyon <david.lyon@preisshare.net> on 22 Feb 2007 22:35:48 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] better (?) than DOM
  • From "John Avery" <j.avery@ballarat.edu.au> on 22 Feb 2007 22:27:50 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware
  • From Rick Marshall <rjm@zenucom.com> on 22 Feb 2007 21:01:30 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] better (?) than DOM
  • From Manos Batsis <manos_lists@geekologue.com> on 22 Feb 2007 19:40:31 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware
  • From Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 22 Feb 2007 19:03:36 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware
  • From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 22 Feb 2007 18:35:38 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 22 Feb 2007 18:27:44 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 22 Feb 2007 18:27:29 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] better (?) than DOM
  • From "Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)" <natyoung@cisco.com> on 22 Feb 2007 17:45:18 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware
  • From "Michael Champion" <mc@xegesis.org> on 22 Feb 2007 15:32:25 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware
  • From "Andrew S. Townley" <ast@atownley.org> on 22 Feb 2007 14:50:14 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 22 Feb 2007 13:38:17 -0000
• No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 22 Feb 2007 12:46:08 -0000
• better (?) than DOM
  • From "Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)" <natyoung@cisco.com> on 22 Feb 2007 00:02:43 -0000
• java 6 XMLReaderFactory
  • From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 21 Feb 2007 20:40:44 -0000
• duplicate dc:identifer tags
  • From "tom tom" <tomxsllist@hotmail.com> on 21 Feb 2007 17:44:41 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Webelo 2.0: The Mythed and Mythstery (WAS RE: [xml-dev] YouTube videos re: documents and XML)
  • From Tei <oscar.vives@gmail.com> on 21 Feb 2007 13:00:03 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s)
  • From richard@inf.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) on 21 Feb 2007 12:57:51 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s)
  • From Chris Burdess <dog@bluezoo.org> on 21 Feb 2007 08:50:36 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s)
  • From "Shlomo Yona" <S.Yona@F5.com> on 21 Feb 2007 04:46:01 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s)
  • From "Shlomo Yona" <S.Yona@F5.com> on 21 Feb 2007 04:31:10 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Webelo 2.0: The Mythed and Mythstery (WAS RE: [xml-dev]YouTube videos re: documents and XML)
  • From Robin Cover <robin@oasis-open.org> on 21 Feb 2007 03:36:18 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Webelo 2.0: The Mythed and Mythstery (WAS RE: [xml-dev]YouTube videos re: documents and XML)
  • From Rick Marshall <rjm@zenucom.com> on 21 Feb 2007 03:26:59 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Webelo 2.0: The Mythed and Mythstery (WAS RE: [xml-dev] YouTube videos re: documents and XML)
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 21 Feb 2007 03:11:19 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Webelo 2.0: The Mythed and Mythstery (WAS RE: [xml-dev]YouTube videos re: documents and XML)
  • From Rick Marshall <rjm@zenucom.com> on 21 Feb 2007 00:16:05 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s)
  • From richard@inf.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) on 20 Feb 2007 22:57:48 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s)
  • From "Shlomo Yona" <S.Yona@F5.com> on 20 Feb 2007 19:03:26 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s)
  • From "Shlomo Yona" <S.Yona@F5.com> on 20 Feb 2007 19:02:36 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Webelo 2.0: The Mythed and Mythstery (WAS RE: [xml-dev] YouTube videos re: documents and XML)
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 20 Feb 2007 17:47:15 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s)
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com> on 20 Feb 2007 17:46:11 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s)
  • From "Anne Thomas Manes" <atmanes@gmail.com> on 20 Feb 2007 17:33:40 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s)
  • From noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 20 Feb 2007 17:07:38 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s)
  • From noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 20 Feb 2007 16:26:31 -0000
• RDDL documents
  • From Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> on 20 Feb 2007 16:23:00 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s)
  • From noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 20 Feb 2007 16:19:12 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s)
  • From Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 20 Feb 2007 16:15:13 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s)
  • From Chris Burdess <dog@bluezoo.org> on 20 Feb 2007 16:07:56 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Webelo 2.0: The Mythed and Mythstery (WAS RE: [xml-dev] YouTube videos re: documents and XML)
  • From Tei <oscar.vives@gmail.com> on 20 Feb 2007 16:06:26 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s)
  • From "Shlomo Yona" <S.Yona@F5.com> on 20 Feb 2007 15:59:23 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s)
  • From richard@inf.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) on 20 Feb 2007 15:55:55 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s)
  • From "Shlomo Yona" <S.Yona@F5.com> on 20 Feb 2007 15:55:52 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s)
  • From Chris Burdess <dog@bluezoo.org> on 20 Feb 2007 15:55:10 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s)
  • From "Shlomo Yona" <S.Yona@F5.com> on 20 Feb 2007 15:50:10 -0000
• Webelo 2.0: The Mythed and Mythstery (WAS RE: [xml-dev] YouTube videos re: documents and XML)
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 20 Feb 2007 13:01:36 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s)
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 20 Feb 2007 12:20:06 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s)
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 20 Feb 2007 12:18:07 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s)
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com> on 20 Feb 2007 10:11:10 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s)
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@gmail.com> on 20 Feb 2007 09:49:24 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s)
  • From "Shlomo Yona" <S.Yona@F5.com> on 20 Feb 2007 09:27:36 -0000
• YouTube videos re: documents and XML
  • From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> on 20 Feb 2007 04:42:09 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s)
  • From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 20 Feb 2007 03:48:31 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] xml with no -->"<?xml version?>"
  • From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 20 Feb 2007 03:44:42 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007
  • From "Robert Koberg" <rob@koberg.com> on 19 Feb 2007 21:48:14 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s)
  • From Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 19 Feb 2007 21:12:18 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007
  • From Rick Marshall <rjm@zenucom.com> on 19 Feb 2007 20:44:45 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007
  • From noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 19 Feb 2007 19:58:33 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007
  • From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 19 Feb 2007 19:26:46 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007
  • From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 19 Feb 2007 19:24:49 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007
  • From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 19 Feb 2007 19:19:16 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007
  • From "Stephen Green" <stephen.green@bristol.gov.uk> on 19 Feb 2007 18:48:13 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007
  • From "Michael Champion" <mc@xegesis.org> on 19 Feb 2007 18:23:07 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com> on 19 Feb 2007 18:18:38 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007
  • From "Stephen Green" <stephen.green@bristol.gov.uk> on 19 Feb 2007 18:07:26 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007
  • From "Stephen Green" <stephen.green@bristol.gov.uk> on 19 Feb 2007 18:04:52 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007
  • From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 19 Feb 2007 18:00:45 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007
  • From "Stephen Green" <stephen.green@bristol.gov.uk> on 19 Feb 2007 18:00:36 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007
  • From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 19 Feb 2007 17:58:33 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007
  • From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 19 Feb 2007 17:56:10 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007
  • From "Stephen Green" <stephen.green@bristol.gov.uk> on 19 Feb 2007 17:53:15 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007
  • From "Stephen Green" <stephen.green@bristol.gov.uk> on 19 Feb 2007 17:49:29 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007
  • From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 19 Feb 2007 17:42:58 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007
  • From Robin Berjon <robin@joost.com> on 19 Feb 2007 17:38:41 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007
  • From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 19 Feb 2007 17:32:57 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007
  • From "Stephen Green" <stephen.green@bristol.gov.uk> on 19 Feb 2007 17:13:44 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007
  • From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 19 Feb 2007 16:56:03 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s)
  • From "Anne Thomas Manes" <atmanes@gmail.com> on 19 Feb 2007 12:13:23 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s)
  • From Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> on 19 Feb 2007 09:27:44 -0000
• a namespace definitions related question(s)
  • From "Shlomo Yona" <S.Yona@F5.com> on 19 Feb 2007 09:19:50 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] xml with no -->"<?xml version?>"
  • From Philippe Poulard <Philippe.Poulard@sophia.inria.fr> on 19 Feb 2007 08:39:36 -0000
• Online writeup of recent Schematron discussions
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 18 Feb 2007 19:12:54 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 18 Feb 2007 11:59:34 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over
  • From "Radu Cernuta" <radu.cernuta@gmail.com> on 18 Feb 2007 11:16:57 -0000
• Re: [SPAM] [xml-dev] anyone familiar with a xml format for describing keyboard mappings?
  • From Martin Probst <martin@x-hive.com> on 18 Feb 2007 09:02:19 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] xml with no -->"<?xml version?>"
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 17 Feb 2007 22:20:38 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] xml with no -->"<?xml version?>"
  • From Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> on 17 Feb 2007 11:59:48 -0000
• Re:&nbsp;[xml-dev]&nbsp;xml&nbsp;with&nbsp;no&nbsp;-->"<?xml&nbsp; version?>"
  • From "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 16 Feb 2007 23:14:57 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] xml with no -->"<?xml version?>"
  • From "derek denny-brown" <zuligag@gmail.com> on 16 Feb 2007 20:19:08 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema Datatypes - token, string, normalizedString - any difference?
  • From "derek denny-brown" <zuligag@gmail.com> on 16 Feb 2007 19:35:48 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] xml with no -->"<?xml version?>"
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com> on 16 Feb 2007 17:30:24 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] xml with no -->"<?xml version?>"
  • From PTrehan@westell.com on 16 Feb 2007 17:14:07 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] xml with no -->"<?xml version?>"
  • From "Sudheshna Iyer" <sudheshnaiyer@hotmail.com> on 16 Feb 2007 17:07:41 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] xml with no -->"<?xml version?>"
  • From "Sreeni Yetchina -X \(syetchin - Pure Solutions at Cisco\)" <syetchin@cisco.com> on 16 Feb 2007 15:51:27 -0000
• xml with no -->"<?xml version?>"
  • From "Sudheshna Iyer" <sudheshnaiyer@hotmail.com> on 16 Feb 2007 15:49:52 -0000
• XML Schema Datatypes - token, string, normalizedString - any difference?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 16 Feb 2007 12:29:34 -0000
• Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007
  • From "Stephen Green" <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> on 15 Feb 2007 21:09:49 -0000
• Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007
  • From "Stephen Green" <stephen.green@bristol.gov.uk> on 15 Feb 2007 16:23:50 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over
  • From Robin Berjon <robin@joost.com> on 15 Feb 2007 14:48:55 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 15 Feb 2007 00:39:34 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over
  • From Rick Marshall <rjm@zenucom.com> on 14 Feb 2007 21:52:51 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over
  • From Greg Hunt <greg@firmansyah.com> on 14 Feb 2007 21:11:43 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over
  • From "Lindsey, Jack" <Jack.Lindsey@cra-arc.gc.ca> on 14 Feb 2007 19:55:36 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Looking for an example of importing an xsd into a wsdl
  • From "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@googlemail.com> on 14 Feb 2007 17:12:14 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over
  • From "Bret Foreman" <bret@scaledarchitectures.com> on 14 Feb 2007 16:59:24 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over
  • From <Peter.Kirkham@generaldynamics.uk.com> on 14 Feb 2007 16:28:27 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over
  • From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 14 Feb 2007 16:03:50 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 14 Feb 2007 15:59:08 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 14 Feb 2007 15:53:08 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over
  • From "Michael Champion" <mc@xegesis.org> on 14 Feb 2007 15:40:04 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over
  • From Stefan Tilkov <info@tilkov.com> on 14 Feb 2007 15:21:55 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 14 Feb 2007 15:08:59 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 14 Feb 2007 15:04:19 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over
  • From noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 14 Feb 2007 14:37:13 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@gmail.com> on 14 Feb 2007 14:01:28 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over
  • From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 14 Feb 2007 13:52:12 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over
  • From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 14 Feb 2007 13:42:58 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over
  • From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 14 Feb 2007 13:31:03 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over
  • From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 14 Feb 2007 13:27:15 -0000
• [Summary] Schematron Question: proper way to express the text version of assertions?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 14 Feb 2007 12:38:55 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 14 Feb 2007 11:03:39 -0000
• More predictions to mull over
  • From "Michael Champion" <mc@xegesis.org> on 14 Feb 2007 07:08:06 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] sets of parsing rules
  • From "Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)" <natyoung@cisco.com> on 13 Feb 2007 17:55:07 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Schematron Question: proper way to express the text version of assertions?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 13 Feb 2007 13:31:00 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Schematron Question: proper way to express the textversion of assertions?
  • From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 13 Feb 2007 02:27:22 -0000
• xmlSchemaValidateDoc
  • From "Suresh Chandak" <sureshchandak@gmail.com> on 13 Feb 2007 02:01:23 -0000
• xsd + wsdl + WS-I
  • From "Bret Foreman" <bret@scaledarchitectures.com> on 13 Feb 2007 00:27:32 -0000
• anyone familiar with a xml format for describing keyboard mappings?
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@gmail.com> on 12 Feb 2007 20:28:27 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Schematron Question: proper way to express the text version of assertions?
  • From <Peter.Kirkham@generaldynamics.uk.com> on 12 Feb 2007 17:24:46 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Schematron Question: proper way to express the text version of assertions?
  • From Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org> on 12 Feb 2007 15:58:34 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Schematron Question: proper way to express the text version of assertions?
  • From "Peter Hunsberger" <peter.hunsberger@gmail.com> on 12 Feb 2007 15:00:55 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Schematron Question: proper way to express the text version of assertions?
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@gmail.com> on 12 Feb 2007 14:39:41 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Schematron Question: proper way to express the text version of assertions?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 12 Feb 2007 14:09:58 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Schematron Question: proper way to express the text version of assertions?
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@gmail.com> on 12 Feb 2007 14:04:48 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Schematron Question: proper way to express the text version of assertions?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 12 Feb 2007 13:58:18 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Schematron Question: proper way to express the text version of assertions?
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@gmail.com> on 12 Feb 2007 13:12:41 -0000
• Schematron Question: proper way to express the text version of assertions?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 12 Feb 2007 12:44:21 -0000
• XForms.org
  • From "Kurt Cagle" <kurt.cagle@gmail.com> on 12 Feb 2007 00:38:24 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Brain Teaser: Element Author is of type xsd:string,what's an illegal value of Author?
  • From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 10 Feb 2007 06:46:23 -0000
• Looking for an example of importing an xsd into a wsdl
  • From "Bret Foreman" <bret@scaledarchitectures.com> on 9 Feb 2007 22:34:58 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Brain Teaser: Element Author is of type xsd:string, what's an illegal value of Author?
  • From Brendan <melbourne.research@gmail.com> on 9 Feb 2007 19:22:35 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Brain Teaser: Element Author is of type xsd:string, what's an illegal value of Author?
  • From Brendan <melbourne.research@gmail.com> on 9 Feb 2007 18:30:10 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Brain Teaser: Element Author is of type xsd:string, what's an illegal value of Author?
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com> on 9 Feb 2007 18:00:46 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Brain Teaser: Element Author is of type xsd:string, what's anillegal value of Author?
  • From noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 9 Feb 2007 17:42:59 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Brain Teaser: Element Author is of type xsd:string, what's an illegal value of Author?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 9 Feb 2007 17:06:39 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Brain Teaser: Element Author is of type xsd:string, what's anillegal value of Author?
  • From noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 9 Feb 2007 15:48:18 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Brain Teaser: Element Author is of type xsd:string, what's an illegal value of Author?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 9 Feb 2007 15:02:17 -0000
• Brain Teaser: Element Author is of type xsd:string, what's an illegal value of Author?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 9 Feb 2007 12:59:22 -0000
• yax XProc (XML Pipeline Language) Implementation, new: Fop/PDF step, xml catalog awareness for XSLT and XInclude
  • From <joerg.moebius@hamburg.de> on 8 Feb 2007 22:25:55 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] sets of parsing rules
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 8 Feb 2007 10:05:46 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] sets of parsing rules
  • From Philippe Poulard <Philippe.Poulard@sophia.inria.fr> on 8 Feb 2007 08:43:47 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] sets of parsing rules
  • From "Waters, Michael, Springer US" <Mike.Waters@springer.com> on 8 Feb 2007 03:02:20 -0000
• RE: Erado UCEI: 5.3 RE: [xml-dev] XML schema model - Java implementations
  • From "Jeff Lowery" <jlowery@myrio.com> on 7 Feb 2007 23:51:04 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XML schema model - Java implementations
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 7 Feb 2007 23:44:45 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XML schema model - Java implementations
  • From "Jeff Lowery" <jlowery@myrio.com> on 7 Feb 2007 23:31:10 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] sets of parsing rules
  • From Rick Marshall <rjm@zenucom.com> on 7 Feb 2007 23:22:49 -0000
• sets of parsing rules
  • From "Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)" <natyoung@cisco.com> on 7 Feb 2007 22:37:29 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XML schema model - Java implementations
  • From "Schneider, John Adam CAR" <John.A.Schneider@carrier.utc.com> on 7 Feb 2007 22:37:25 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] DSDL - datatypes, how far along?
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@gmail.com> on 7 Feb 2007 20:17:01 -0000
• RE: Erado UCEI: 4.0 Re: [xml-dev] RELAX NG equivalent of <xsd:any processContents="lax">?
  • From "Jeff Lowery" <jlowery@myrio.com> on 7 Feb 2007 20:16:07 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RELAX NG equivalent of <xsd:any processContents="lax">?
  • From "Radu Cernuta" <radu.cernuta@gmail.com> on 7 Feb 2007 20:02:38 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] RELAX NG equivalent of <xsd:any processContents="lax">?
  • From "Jeff Lowery" <jlowery@myrio.com> on 7 Feb 2007 19:36:13 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] DSDL - datatypes, how far along?
  • From Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk> on 7 Feb 2007 17:41:25 -0000
• Re: [SPAM] RE: [xml-dev] XML schema model - Java implementations
  • From RameshNethi <ramesh.nethi@sonoasystems.com> on 7 Feb 2007 16:51:25 -0000
• DSDL - datatypes, how far along?
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@gmail.com> on 7 Feb 2007 13:31:54 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RELAX NG equivalent of <xsd:any processContents="lax">?
  • From "Radu Cernuta" <radu.cernuta@gmail.com> on 7 Feb 2007 09:56:30 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RELAX NG equivalent of <xsd:any processContents="lax">?
  • From "Radu Cernuta" <radu.cernuta@gmail.com> on 7 Feb 2007 08:19:20 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] RELAX NG equivalent of <xsd:any processContents="lax">?
  • From "Jeff Lowery" <jlowery@myrio.com> on 7 Feb 2007 01:26:52 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] An element with more than one possible type
  • From noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 7 Feb 2007 00:20:24 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RELAX NG equivalent of <xsd:any processContents="lax">?
  • From "Radu Cernuta" <radu.cernuta@gmail.com> on 6 Feb 2007 22:43:43 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RELAX NG equivalent of <xsd:any processContents="lax">?
  • From "Radu Cernuta" <radu.cernuta@gmail.com> on 6 Feb 2007 22:38:30 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RELAX NG equivalent of <xsd:any processContents="lax">?
  • From noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 6 Feb 2007 22:34:46 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] RELAX NG equivalent of <xsd:any processContents="lax">?
  • From "Jeff Lowery" <jlowery@myrio.com> on 6 Feb 2007 22:26:59 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] RELAX NG equivalent of <xsd:any processContents="lax">?
  • From "Jeff Lowery" <jlowery@myrio.com> on 6 Feb 2007 22:19:45 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RELAX NG equivalent of <xsd:any processContents="lax">?
  • From "Radu Cernuta" <radu.cernuta@gmail.com> on 6 Feb 2007 22:00:29 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RELAX NG equivalent of <xsd:any processContents="lax">?
  • From "Radu Cernuta" <radu.cernuta@gmail.com> on 6 Feb 2007 21:59:04 -0000
• OASIS Symposium 2007 Conference Program Available
  • From "Jane Harnad" <jane.harnad@oasis-open.org> on 6 Feb 2007 21:25:49 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] RELAX NG equivalent of <xsd:any processContents="lax">?
  • From "Jeff Lowery" <jlowery@myrio.com> on 6 Feb 2007 16:58:10 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RELAX NG equivalent of <xsd:any processContents="lax">?
  • From noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 6 Feb 2007 15:15:31 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RELAX NG equivalent of <xsd:any processContents="lax">?
  • From "Radu Cernuta" <radu.cernuta@gmail.com> on 6 Feb 2007 11:49:45 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Performance Vs Size of XSD + Extension of restriction
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com> on 6 Feb 2007 09:17:58 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XML schema model - Java implementations
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 6 Feb 2007 08:57:31 -0000
• XML schema model - Java implementations
  • From RameshNethi <ramesh.nethi@sonoasystems.com> on 6 Feb 2007 07:42:41 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Performance Vs Size of XSD + Extension of restriction
  • From "Sudheshna Iyer" <sudheshnaiyer@hotmail.com> on 6 Feb 2007 00:27:30 -0000
• RELAX NG equivalent of <xsd:any processContents="lax">?
  • From "Jeff Lowery" <jlowery@myrio.com> on 5 Feb 2007 23:25:24 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Performance Vs Size of XSD + Extension of restriction
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com> on 5 Feb 2007 20:26:58 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Performance Vs Size of XSD + Extension of restriction
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 5 Feb 2007 19:08:53 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Performance Vs Size of XSD + Extension of restriction
  • From "Sudheshna Iyer" <sudheshnaiyer@hotmail.com> on 5 Feb 2007 18:16:46 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Performance Vs Size of XSD + Extension of restriction
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 5 Feb 2007 18:00:57 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Performance Vs Size of XSD + Extension of restriction
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com> on 5 Feb 2007 17:28:12 -0000
• keyref works in xsd but not in wsdl
  • From "pau carre" <pau.carre@gmail.com> on 5 Feb 2007 12:35:54 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Performance Vs Size of XSD + Extension of restriction
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 4 Feb 2007 09:30:10 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] An element with more than one possible type
  • From Rick Marshall <rjm@zenucom.com> on 4 Feb 2007 06:23:19 -0000
• Performance Vs Size of XSD + Extension of restriction
  • From "Sudheshna Iyer" <sudheshnaiyer@hotmail.com> on 3 Feb 2007 23:57:11 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Recent allegations about me
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 3 Feb 2007 03:47:54 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] key and keyref problems
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 2 Feb 2007 16:56:26 -0000
• key and keyref problems
  • From "pau carre" <pau.carre@gmail.com> on 2 Feb 2007 16:12:15 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] An element with more than one possible type
  • From "Radu Cernuta" <radu.cernuta@gmail.com> on 2 Feb 2007 12:48:16 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] An element with more than one possible type
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com> on 2 Feb 2007 12:07:27 -0000
• An element with more than one possible type
  • From "pau carre" <pau.carre@gmail.com> on 2 Feb 2007 11:23:59 -0000
• An element with more than one possible type
  • From "pau carre" <pau.carre@gmail.com> on 2 Feb 2007 11:08:01 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Look-up tables in XML Schema
  • From "Stephen Green" <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> on 2 Feb 2007 09:56:12 -0000
• Look-up tables in XML Schema
  • From "John Avery" <j.avery@ballarat.edu.au> on 2 Feb 2007 05:00:43 -0000
• yax XProc (XML Pipeline Language) Implementation, new: ant interface, log4j logging, comprehensive collection of examples
  • From <joerg.moebius@hamburg.de> on 1 Feb 2007 16:34:24 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XML processor attacks
  • From "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 1 Feb 2007 11:22:05 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XML processor attacks
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 1 Feb 2007 10:36:25 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XML processor attacks
  • From Tei <oscar.vives@gmail.com> on 1 Feb 2007 10:27:09 -0000